{"id":16,"date":"2026-11-05T02:51:49","date_gmt":"2026-11-05T02:51:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/?page_id=16"},"modified":"2026-11-05T02:51:49","modified_gmt":"2026-11-05T02:51:49","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/?page_id=16","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n\r\n\r\n<h3>I. On Plato&#8217;s <em>Republic<\/em>, more or less:<\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Imagery-Utopia-Republic.pdf\">\u201cImagery and Utopia in Plato&#8217;s\u00a0<em>Republic<\/em>\u201d<\/a>, in\u00a0<em>Rereading Plato\u2019s Republic<\/em>, M.M. McCabe and Simon Tr\u00e9panier (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2025), 351-370.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Theory-Tripartite-Soul-BACAP-published.pdf\">\u201cWhat Kind of Theory is the Theory of the Tripartite Soul?\u201d<\/a>, in\u00a0<em>Proceedings of the XXXVIIth Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>, G. Gurtler ed., Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2016, 53-83.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Plato and the Divided Self<\/em>. Co-edited with Tad Brennan and Charles Brittain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Eros-Necessity-Cave-Barney-published.pdf\">\u201cEros and Necessity in the Ascent from the Cave\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Ancient Philosophy<\/em>\u00a028:2 Spring (2008): 357-72.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-City-of-Pigs.pdf\">\u201cPlatonism, Moral Nostalgia and the City of Pigs\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>17 (2001): 207-27.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Ring-Composition-published-2010.pdf\">\u201cRing-Composition in Plato: the Case of\u00a0<em>Republic<\/em>\u00a0X\u201d<\/a>, in M. McPherran (ed.),\u00a0<em>Cambridge Critical Guide to Plato\u2019s\u00a0<u>Republic<\/u><\/em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 32-51.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Socrates-Thrasymachus-Blackwell-published.pdf\">\u201cSocrates\u2019 Refutation of Thrasymachus\u201d<\/a>, in G. Santas (ed.),\u00a0<em>The Blackwell Guide to Plato\u2019s Republic<\/em>, Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 44-62.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cCallicles and Thrasymachus\u201d,\u00a0<em>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy<\/em>, 2004.\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/callicles-thrasymachus\/\">&lt;\u00a0http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/callicles-thrasymachus\/&gt;<\/a>. Revised 2011 and 2017.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h3>II. On the <em>Cratylus:<\/em><\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Names-and-Nature-in-Platos-Cratylus.pdf\"><em>Names and Nature in Plato\u2019s\u00a0<u>Cratylus<\/u><\/em><\/a>.<em>\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0New York: Routledge, 2001.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/cratylus-socrates-agonistes-barney-published.pdf\">\u201cSocrates Agonistes: the Case of the\u00a0<em>Cratylus<\/em>\u00a0Etymologies\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>\u00a016 (1998): 63-98.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Conventionalism.pdf\">\u201cPlato on Conventionalism\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Phronesis<\/em>\u00a042 (1997): 143-62.\u00a0\u00a0\u201cAppearances and Impressions\u201d,\u00a0<em>Phronesis<\/em>\u00a037 (1992): 283-313<\/p>\r\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h3>III. Other topics in Plato:<\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Platonic-Qua-Predication-published.pdf\">\u201cPlatonic Qua Predication\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Analytic Philosophy<\/em>\u00a02023, 1-20.<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Plato-Kalon.pdf\">\u201cNotes on Plato on the <em>Kalon<\/em> and the Good\u201d<\/a>, <em>Classical Philology<\/em> (<em>Special Issue: Beauty, Harmony and the Good<\/em>), 105 (2010): 363-377.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Socrates-Intellectualism-Hypothesis-Barney-published.pdf\">\u201cIntellectualism and the Method of Hypothesis in Plato&#8217;s Early Dialogues\u201d<\/a>, in\u00a0<em>Psychology and Value in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy: The Ninth Keeling Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>, edited by M. R. Hampson and F. Leigh (Oxford, 2022), 21-53.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Statesman-Normative-Measurement-published.pdf\">\u201cPlato on Normative Measurement:\u00a0<em>Statesman\u00a0<\/em>283b1-287b3\u201d<\/a>, in\u00a0<em>Plato&#8217;s Statesman: A Philosophical Discussion<\/em>, eds. P. Dimas, M. Lane, and S.S. Meyer, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 115-35.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-techne-model-Plato-published.pdf\">\u201cTechne as a Model for Virtue in Plato\u201d<\/a>, in\u00a0<em>Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>, ed. T. Johansen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 62-85.\u201cNotes on Plato on the\u00a0<em>Kalon<\/em>\u00a0and the Good\u201d,\u00a0<em>Classical Philology<\/em>\u00a0(<em>Special Issue: Beauty, Harmony and the Good<\/em>), 105 (2010): 363-377.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Desire-Good-published.pdf\">\u201cPlato on Desire for the Good\u201d<\/a>, in S. Tenenbaum (ed.),\u00a0<em>Desire, Good, and Practical Reason<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 34-64.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Carpenter-Good.pdf\">\u201cThe Carpenter and the Good\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0in D. Cairns, F. G. Herrmann, and T. Penner (eds.),\u00a0\u00a0<em>Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato&#8217;s Republic<\/em>, 293-319. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 2008.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPlato on Measure and the Good: the Rank-Ordering of the\u00a0<em>Philebus<\/em>\u201d, in J. Jirsa, F. Karfik, S. Spinka (eds.),\u00a0<em>Plato&#8217;s Philebus: Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium Platonicum Pragense<\/em>\u00a0Praha: Oikoymenh Publishers, 2017, 208-29.<\/p>\r\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h3>IV. On the sophists:<\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Gorgias.pdf\">\u201cGorgias&#8217; Defence: Plato and his Opponents on Rhetoric and the Good\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Southern Journal of Philosophy<\/em>\u00a048.1 (2010): 95-121.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Protagoras-Myth-Ganph-published.pdf\">\u201cProtagoras and the Myth of Plato&#8217;s\u00a0<em>Protagoras<\/em>\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>GANPh [Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Antike Philosophie] Proceedings V<\/em>, ed. C. Riedweg, Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019, 135-160.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Gorgias-Helen-published.pdf\">\u201cGorgias&#8217;\u00a0<em>Encomium of Helen<\/em>\u201d<\/a>, in\u00a0<em>Ten Neglected Classics of<\/em>\u00a0<em>Philosophy<\/em>, ed. E. Schliesser, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 1-25.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/The-Sophistic-Movement-published.pdf\">\u201cThe Sophistic Movement\u201d<\/a>, in M.L. Gill and P. Pellegrin (eds.),\u00a0<em>A Companion to Ancient Philosophy<\/em>, Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 77-97.<\/p>\r\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<h3>V. Aristotle and Others:<\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/aristotle_on_trolling-published.pdf\">\u201c[Aristotle],\u00a0<em>On Trolling<\/em>\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Journal of the American Philosophical Association<\/em>\u00a02:2 (2016): 193-95.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Aristotle-Becoming-Bad-OSAP-published.pdf\">\u201cBecoming Bad: Aristotle on Vicious Habituation\u201d<\/a>, Festschrift for John M. Cooper, ed. Ben Morison and Hendrik Lorenz,\u00a0<em>Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>\u00a0special volume 57 (2019), 273-307.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Aristotle-Function-Argument-RB-published.pdf\">\u201cAristotle\u2019s Argument for a Human Function\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>\u00a034 (2008): 293-322.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Barney-Aristotle-Metaphysics-A3-published.pdf\">\u201cHistory and Dialectic (<em>Metaphysics<\/em>\u00a0A 3, 983a24-4b8)\u201d<\/a>, in Carlos Steel ed.,\u00a0<em>Aristotle&#8217;s Metaphysics Alpha (Symposium Aristotelicum XVIII)<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press,<em>\u00a0<\/em>2012, 69-104.<\/p>\r\n<p>\r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Puzzle-Stoic-Ethics-Barney-published.pdf\">\u201cA Puzzle in Stoic Ethics\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0<em>Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy<\/em>\u00a024 (2003): 303-40.<\/p>\r\n<div><span lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Appearances-and-Impressions-Barney-published.pdf\">\u201cAppearances and Impressions\u201d<\/a>, <i>Phronesis<\/i> 37 (1992): 283-313<\/span><\/div>\r\n<div>\u00a0<\/div>\r\n<div><span lang=\"EN-US\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/aims_and_argument_of_the_tusculan_disputations-published.pdf\">\u201cThe Aims and Argument of the <i>Tusculan Disputations<\/i>\u201d<\/a>, in <i>Cicero\u2019s Tusculan Disputations<\/i> (= <i>Symposium Hellenisticum XV<\/i> volume), eds. J. Warren and C.F. Brittain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025), 12-34. <\/span><\/div>\r\n<p>\r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSimplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority\u201d,\u00a0<em>Antiquorum Philosophia<\/em>\u00a03 (2009): 101-20.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Kant-on-Conditionality-published.pdf\">\u201cThe Inner Voice: Kant on Conditionality and God as Cause\u201d<\/a>,\u00a0in\u00a0<em>Aristotle and Kant on the Highest Good<\/em>, ed. J. Aufderheide and R. Bader,\u00a0Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 159-82.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I. On Plato&#8217;s Republic, more or less: \u201cImagery and Utopia in Plato&#8217;s\u00a0Republic\u201d, in\u00a0Rereading Plato\u2019s Republic, M.M. McCabe and Simon Tr\u00e9panier (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2025), 351-370. \u201cWhat Kind of Theory is the Theory of the Tripartite Soul?\u201d, in\u00a0Proceedings of the XXXVIIth Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, G. Gurtler ed., Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2016, 53-83. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-16","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/16","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/16\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83,"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/16\/revisions\/83"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rachelbarney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}